苏美尔吧 关注:5,070贴子:45,935
  • 1回复贴,共1

果然伊朗考古见解不同:埃兰王国公元前3500年起[1P]

取消只看楼主收藏回复



然后该文中,埃兰人骨骼特征是跟苏美人一路的。
虽然不清楚依据引自何处,但在波兰研究小组的DNA文章中,也明确提到,乌尔王陵遗骸的检测报告中,王陵中的诸多遗骸,其特征来自伊朗或印度。
本人相信该文章此处依据,也是引用《乌尔王陵遗骸检测报告》一文。


IP属地:广西1楼2018-12-22 22:38回复
    哦,《乌尔王陵遗骸检测报告》,是本人惯用喊法,不算正经。正式名称为《伍利在乌尔城挖掘的人类遗骸(伊拉克)》。
    For instance, it is commonly accepted that the founders of Sumerian civilization came from the outside of the region, their exact origin is, however, still a matter of debate. It is suggested that migrants of Iranian, Indian [32],
    32.The Human Remains from Woolley’s Excavations at Ur “Iraq” 65: British Institute for the Study of Iraque
    节选自:《mtDNA from the Early Bronze Age to the Roman Period Suggests a Genetic Link between the Indian Subcontinent and Mesopotamian Cradle of Civilization》


    IP属地:广西2楼2018-12-22 22:46
    回复